The Davis-Bacon Act is one of several federal laws that govern payment of workers on federal projects. The Act covers a significant portion of the projects undertaken by the construction industry. Approximately 20% of all construction projects in the U.S. are covered by Davis-Bacon, affecting more than a quarter of all construction workers in the nation at any given time.
The Act requires contractors and subcontractors on federal projects (i.e., construction, alteration or repair of public buildings or public works) to pay their laborers who work on those projects no less than the "locally prevailing wages" and specific employee benefits for corresponding work on similar projects in the area.
The determination of locally prevailing wages is made by the U.S. Department of Labor and includes the (a) basic hourly rate of pay, (b) hourly rate of contributions and (c) hourly rate of cost that may be reasonably anticipated in providing benefits. The determination is generally based on Davis-Bacon wage surveys and by levels set by local collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), whichever is higher.
The Labor Department's local wage determination applies to all identifiable classifications of work to be performed. An employee who works in more than one classification must be paid for the actual time spent doing work under each classification.
BACKGROUND
Davis-Bacon was passed during the Great Depression and signed into law by President Hoover. At a time when much of the nation's construction activity was federally funded, through the Works Progress Administration (WPA) and other federal initiatives, Davis-Bacon sought to protect the wages of local, largely unionized workers against non-union persons who would migrate to an area in search of jobs and were willing to work for whatever they could get.
Today, as throughout its 80-plus-year history, Davis-Bacon is politically controversial and commercially burdensome. Compliance with Davis-Bacon places greater burdens on contractors than simply paying wages set by the Labor Department. On the front end, the higher wages normally required on federal projects affects estimates and bidding.
On the back end:
| Lang Thal King & Hanson PC
Lang Thal King & Hanson PC is a 2024 Best Law Firms Metro Tier 1 (Scottsdale) selectee for Construction Law, Construction Litigation and Commercial Litigation, and a Tier 2 selectee for Arbitration.
The act of visiting or communicating with Lang Thal King & Hanson PC, via this website or by email does not create an attorney-client relationship. Communications from non-clients are not subject to client confidentiality or attorney-client privilege.
Further, the articles, discussion, commentary, forms and sample documentation contained in this website are offered as general guidance only and are not to be relied upon as specific legal advice. For legal advice on a specific matter, please consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable and experienced in that area. While the articles on this website accurately describe applicable law on the subject covered as of the date of publication, the law continues to develop with the passage of time. Accordingly, care should be taken to verify that the statutes, case law and regulations described have not changed since the article's publication.
The lawyers listed in this website practice law only in the jurisdictions where they are admitted. This website is regulated by the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct.
Lang Thal King & Hanson construction, litigation and business attorneys represent contractors, subcontractors and general business owners in construction law, contractor licensing, collections and general commercial litigation in the Phoenix area and throughout Arizona.