Legislative amendments enacted in 2010 gave all owners, contractors and subcontractors broader rights and responsibilities. The amendments apply to projects put out for bid after January 1, 2011.
Summary of the Law Before the 2010 Amendments
Summary of the Amendments Enacted in 2010
Arizona law provides somewhat different payment rights and requirements on public-sector projects. See a summary.
The Prompt Payment Act does not apply to work performed on federal projects, according to a 2017 Arizona Court of Appeals ruling,
Effective July 3, 2015, architects and engineers are entitled to prompt payment for services provided on many public projects in Arizona.
Every contractor or subcontractor must pay its licensed subcontractors and suppliers for their labor or materials within seven days of its own receipt of payment from the owner. An unpaid subcontractor or supplier is entitled to interest on unpaid amounts at 18% per annum. Failure to pay is also grounds for disciplinary action by the Arizona Registrar of Contractors. Unlicensed contractors and subcontractors cannot enforce the prompt payment law.
The Prompt Payment Act requires regular monthly invoices from materialman to subcontractor, subcontractor to contractor, and contractor to owner, for labor and materials that meet the contract requirements. A contractor or subcontractor is not required to submit a downstream provider’s invoice to the owner for payment if that contractor or subcontractor disputes the sufficiency of the work performed or the materials supplied. A contractor or subcontractor can withhold approval of a subcontractor’s work or a supplier’s materials for unsatisfactory job progress; defective construction work or materials; disputed work or materials; third-party claims filed or reasonable evidence that a claim will be filed; failure to comply with material provisions of the construction contract; failure of the subcontractor to make timely payments for labor, equipment and materials; damage to another tradesman; or reasonable evidence that the subcontract cannot be completed for the unpaid balance of the subcontract price.
However, the 2010 amendments impose greater responsibility on all contractors and subcontractors to pay their own providers. Contractors and subcontractors now must:
Similarly, A.R.S. § 32-1129.01 requires a project owner to promptly pay the general contractor. In most cases, the project owner is required to make monthly progress payments to the general contractor based upon the general contractor’s billing or estimate of work performed during the preceding 30-day billing cycle. However, the owner can modify the billing cycle, retention provisions, and definition of “completion” by placing a plain notice in the contract and on each page of the project plans, including bid plans.
An owner is deemed to have received and approved the general contractor’s monthly progress billing 14 days after receipt, unless the owner issues a written statement detailing the items that are not approved and certified. The owner must issue the progress payment to the general contractor within seven days thereafter. Similar seven-day limits apply to final and retention payments. Late payments bear interest at 18% per annum.
An owner can decline to approve and certify any billing or portion of a billing, and withhold a reasonable amount from the progress payment, for the following reasons:
The owner may withhold only an amount sufficient to pay the direct costs and expenses the owner reasonably expects to incur to protect itself, that results from reasons set forth in its written notice, and for which the contractor is responsible.
A contractor may suspend performance or terminate the construction contract if the owner fails to timely pay the amount certified and approved, provided the contractor gives seven days’ prior written notice to the owner (A.R.S. § 32-1185).
Similarly, a subcontractor may suspend performance or terminate a subcontract if (a) the owner fails to timely pay the amount certified and approved for the subcontractor’s work, and (b) the general contractor also fails to pay for that work. Before suspending performance or terminating the subcontract for this reason, a subcontractor must give three days’ prior written notice to the general contractor and the owner (A.R.S. § 32-1185).
A subcontractor also may suspend performance or terminate a subcontract if the owner timely pays the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work but the general contractor fails to pay the subcontractor. In this instance the subcontractor must give seven days’ prior written notice to the general contractor and the owner.
A subcontractor may suspend performance or terminate a subcontract if the owner declines to certify and approve payment for the subcontractor’s work, but the reason for refusal is not the fault of the subcontractor or directly related to the subcontractor’s work. In this instance the subcontractor must give seven days’ prior written notice to the general contractor and the owner.
Notice
The written notice required by this section must be personally delivered to an individual, to a member of a limited liability company, or to an officer of a corporation, or delivered by any means that gives written, third-party verification of delivery to the business address of the recipient, e.g., by courier or Federal Express.
In each case, the contractor or subcontractor cannot be considered in breach of the contract because it lawfully suspends work or terminates the contract according to the statute. A contractor or subcontractor that suspends performance in compliance with the statute is not required to provide further services or materials until it receives payment of the amount certified and approved, together with the mobilization costs of shutting down and starting up the project.
| Lang Thal King & Hanson PC
Lang Thal King & Hanson PC is a 2024 Best Law Firms Metro Tier 1 (Scottsdale) selectee for Construction Law, Construction Litigation and Commercial Litigation, and a Tier 2 selectee for Arbitration.
The act of visiting or communicating with Lang Thal King & Hanson PC, via this website or by email does not create an attorney-client relationship. Communications from non-clients are not subject to client confidentiality or attorney-client privilege.
Further, the articles, discussion, commentary, forms and sample documentation contained in this website are offered as general guidance only and are not to be relied upon as specific legal advice. For legal advice on a specific matter, please consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable and experienced in that area. While the articles on this website accurately describe applicable law on the subject covered as of the date of publication, the law continues to develop with the passage of time. Accordingly, care should be taken to verify that the statutes, case law and regulations described have not changed since the article's publication.
The lawyers listed in this website practice law only in the jurisdictions where they are admitted. This website is regulated by the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct.
Lang Thal King & Hanson construction, litigation and business attorneys represent contractors, subcontractors and general business owners in construction law, contractor licensing, collections and general commercial litigation in the Phoenix area and throughout Arizona.